More justification for paranoia

This post was written by Friday guest blogger Annie Reid.

The New York Times disclosed this morning that the U.S. government has been spying on citizens, without warrants or court orders, “monitoring” private international calls and international e-mails:

The previously undisclosed decision to permit some eavesdropping inside the country without court approval was a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices, particularly for the National Security Agency, whose mission is to spy on communications abroad. As a result, some officials familiar with the continuing operation have questioned whether the surveillance has stretched, if not crossed, constitutional limits on legal searches.

Even more telling:

The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. After meeting with senior administration officials to hear their concerns, the newspaper delayed publication for a year to conduct additional reporting.

Update (posted by Maud):

Bush, blaming the “enemy that lurks,” and also the Jabberwock (“the jaws that bite, the claws that catch!”), Jubjub bird and frumious Bandersnatch, refuses to discuss the Times report.


You might want to subscribe to my free Substack newsletter, Ancestor Trouble, if the name makes intuitive sense to you.