Clearly he’s been stewing about this for quite some time

Jack Shafer notes that writer Jane Smiley’s anti-Bush letters to the New York Times tend to get published more than the average reader’s, and then subjects the letters to “literary assessments”:

Nobody would call Smiley’s letters to the editor writerly. Cliched references to leopards changing their spots and flatfooted instructions to a somnambulant America to wake up betray her reputation as a stylist.

Perhaps in the future Ms. Smiley will announce her concerns in sestina format.


You might want to subscribe to my free Substack newsletter, Ancestor Trouble, if the name makes intuitive sense to you.