Dr. Seuss? Or Derrida.

Last Friday Ann Hulbert alleged in a Slate article that the instructional tone of Dr. Seuss’s books has spoiled a generation of U.S. readers for literature. Hogwash. There are myriad reasons for the drop-off in literary readership — not least of which is that much of what’s published is banal and boilerplate* — but I tend to join James Wood and Andrew Delbanco in believing that the academization of criticism has something to do with it. More on that later.

*Trust me, I didn’t think so, either, but of the books arrive at my doorstop in little boxes maybe one in ten (and I’m being kind here) is worth reading.


You might want to subscribe to my free Substack newsletter, Ancestor Trouble, if the name makes intuitive sense to you.