free hit
counters

Occasional literary links, amusements, culture, politics, and rants

Notes from a Clinton constituent after the NV caucus

January 19, 2008 | Comments Off

Before Hillary Clinton became my Senator, I made phone calls for her campaign. I wasn’t passionate about her even then, but she was (initally) running against Giuliani and talked a decent game.

When Hillary Clinton ran for re-election in 2006, I left that line of the ballot blank.
 

She voted for the war, and it took her three years to repudiate that vote. She failed to vote against the bankruptcy bill (and supported an earlier version) but showed up to reauthorize the Patriot Act.

If I call her office to find out her position on thornier issues, invariably the Senator “is still deciding.” When she finally does issue a statement and vote, I generally disagree with her position.
 

Granted, I lean to the left of many politicians, including Chuck Schumer, my other Senator, but the people in his office actually listen, or pretend to. I never have the sense that Clinton’s staffers are told to treat constituents’ opinions with any degree of seriousness. In fact, when I called three days after Katrina to suggest that if we can drop leaflets on Afghanistan, we could drop food and water to the stranded citizens of New Orleans, one staffer actually laughed at me.

Of course Clinton was not the one laughing, but her employee’s attitude speaks to her leadership style. Clinton doesn’t care about my opinion, she probably doesn’t care about yours, and she can’t be bothered to tell her office to fake it. She cares about poll results. Once she has charted the best course of triangulation, she will issue her decision from on high.

As a longtime constituent, my overriding feeling about Clinton is that there is absolutely nothing she believes in strongly enough to stand up for it if polls are suggesting the majority tilts the other way. Nothing, that is, except herself.

Comments

Comments are closed.

On Twitter

  • .@GrantaMag's sex issue is available in the iPhone store, for £1.19: http://bit.ly/aLJXHr 53 mins ago
  • McSweeney's seeks to award $2,500 to a female writer, age 32 or younger, of 'outrageous lyricism and heart': http://bit.ly/c2g4oS 1 hr ago
  • .@BookCourt Have thought about writing to the shooter's grandkids, but it's a little awkward to know how to begin. 1 hr ago
  • Er, I meant to say that a lot of amateur genealogists want to find out that THEY'RE (not their) related to Queen Elizabeth, or something. 1 hr ago
  • .@BookCourt Also, one of my granddad's (supposedly thirteen, I've found six) wives shot him in the stomach. http://bit.ly/cr09l3 1 hr ago
  • Recently I joined 23andme, which does genetics-based genealogy, and it's hilarious to see people trying to wriggle out of cold, hard science 1 hr ago
  • Turns out a lot of people don't really want their trees tied to yours on ancestry.com when you put this kind of stuff on there. 1 hr ago
  • And after getting out of jail, he came after my great-granddad in retaliation for his testimony at the trial. 1 hr ago
  • Last month I found deeper background in old Texas criminal cases. Guy he killed had been convicted of attempting to rape his stepdaughter. 1 hr ago
  • A couple years ago I verified the story about my great-granddad killing a man (in self-defense) with a hay hook. http://bit.ly/dpf5Yh 1 hr ago
  • The genealogical information available online these days, if you're willing to hunt in multiple archives, is amazing. 1 hr ago
  • 1,700 recorded oral histories from immigrants who came through Ellis Island available free online starting today: http://bit.ly/cTaBpX 1 hr ago
  • Speaking with the NY Times, Stephenson compared the collaborative experience to writing a TV show. http://nyti.ms/aLAxMh 16 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Subscribe

FTC Disclaimer

Search

Archives