free hit
counters

Occasional literary links, amusements, culture, politics, and rants

Placement costs rise, number of browsers drops

June 6, 2005 | Comments Off

Close on the heels of last week’s post about small press books that the major booksellers won’t stock, The New York Times Book Review and the Denver Post reveal the going rates and procedures for getting your book on Barnes & Noble’s front tables and displays. Says Randy Kennedy:

Numbers are very hard to come by, but some publishers said that the price for placement on front-of-store promotional tables for only a few weeks or a month — in some cases, even, just one week — at Barnes & Noble stores can be between $10,000 and $20,000 per book, depending on the time of year. Placement on eye-catching cardboard displays can cost much more than $20,000.

David Milofsky recalls a comment from the past editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster: “Others sell shoes, we sell books. What’s the difference?”

Meanwhile, the Associated Press wonders if the bookstore browser is a dying breed:

Booksellers and publishers agree that an accelerated society can’t help affecting an industry known for taking its time.

They speak of a more “focused” consumer who knows what he or she wants, which is often the same as what others want — what Simon & Schuster CEO Jack Romanos calls “the herding mentality.”

Here’s a thought: maybe customers browse less because of the what’s laid out on the front tables. Or, as I said last year: “100 shitty books on the front table do not a classic make.”

Comments

Comments are closed.

On Twitter

  • .@GrantaMag's sex issue is available in the iPhone store, for £1.19: http://bit.ly/aLJXHr 1 hr ago
  • McSweeney's seeks to award $2,500 to a female writer, age 32 or younger, of 'outrageous lyricism and heart': http://bit.ly/c2g4oS 1 hr ago
  • .@BookCourt Have thought about writing to the shooter's grandkids, but it's a little awkward to know how to begin. 1 hr ago
  • Er, I meant to say that a lot of amateur genealogists want to find out that THEY'RE (not their) related to Queen Elizabeth, or something. 1 hr ago
  • .@BookCourt Also, one of my granddad's (supposedly thirteen, I've found six) wives shot him in the stomach. http://bit.ly/cr09l3 1 hr ago
  • Recently I joined 23andme, which does genetics-based genealogy, and it's hilarious to see people trying to wriggle out of cold, hard science 1 hr ago
  • Turns out a lot of people don't really want their trees tied to yours on ancestry.com when you put this kind of stuff on there. 1 hr ago
  • And after getting out of jail, he came after my great-granddad in retaliation for his testimony at the trial. 1 hr ago
  • Last month I found deeper background in old Texas criminal cases. Guy he killed had been convicted of attempting to rape his stepdaughter. 1 hr ago
  • A couple years ago I verified the story about my great-granddad killing a man (in self-defense) with a hay hook. http://bit.ly/dpf5Yh 1 hr ago
  • The genealogical information available online these days, if you're willing to hunt in multiple archives, is amazing. 2 hrs ago
  • 1,700 recorded oral histories from immigrants who came through Ellis Island available free online starting today: http://bit.ly/cTaBpX 2 hrs ago
  • Speaking with the NY Times, Stephenson compared the collaborative experience to writing a TV show. http://nyti.ms/aLAxMh 16 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Subscribe

FTC Disclaimer

Search

Archives