free hit
counters

Occasional literary links, amusements, culture, politics, and rants

ZZ Packer’s account of the Crouch – Peck affair

August 12, 2004 | Comments Off

You might have thought you’d heard the last of Stanley Crouch’s assault on Dale Peck — God knows I hadn’t planned on harping on it the way I have — but it turns out that one of my favorite writers, ZZ Packer, was Crouch’s lunch companion that afternoon. She emailed me her recollection of the day’s events (and I post her account with permission):

I was outside Tartine waiting for Mr. Crouch to arrive. When I was back in Cali, he’d called me because he was going to include an essay he’d written about Drinking Coffee Elsewhere in an anthology he’d been working on. (He’s also a friend of James Alan McPherson, one of my greatest friends and mentors.) Since I was going to be in NYC, we decided to meet for lunch.

Anyway, he finally came, we went inside, and sat down. After a few minutes he said, “Is that Dale Peck, behind you?”

And for a second I thought he was talking about someone else (admittedly, I’m slow about these things), and I said, “Oh, we should say hello.”

And then, when Stanley got up, I suddenly remembered “Dale Peck” and his new book, “Hatchet Jobs” and “Dale Peck” who’d written a rather unkind review of Stanley’s book, Don’t the Moon Look Lonesome in the New Republic, and that Heidi Julavits had written about him in the inaugural edition of the Believer. And finally, I remembered Stanley had mentioned Dale Peck in the phone conversation we’d had when I was back in California (about a week before the incident).

Stanley went over to Peck’s table and said, “Are you Dale Peck?”

Now, Yablonsky [Peck's lunch companion] says Dale Peck said, “So what?” but I thought I heard him say, “Yes, I’m Dale Peck.”

And Stanley said, “Stanley Crouch. I just wanted to meet you . . . ” (I didn’t hear the rest.)

Then Stanley, who was still holding Peck’s hand in a frozen handshake, slapped Peck with his other hand, TWICE, on both cheeks, and said, “Don’t you ever do that again. If you do you’ll get much worse.” Stanley let loose Peck’s hand and pointed at him, “I should spit on you. Now, we can settle this outside . . . ”

Dale Peck said, “I don’t want anything to do with that.”

No one in the restaurant knew what to do. I just wasn’t believing what was happening was happening, and just sat there, as did everyone else.

Stanley stood there for a moment, then backed away, saying, to Peck, and, I guess, everyone else in the place (only about five other people, including staff) “I shouldn’t have done that.”

Then he came back over to our table which was, max, five feet away from Peck’s and his friend (Yablonsky) and said, to me, “I’m really sorry you had to see that.”

I told him (rather lamely) that everyone got bad reviews and that a review as vitrolic as Peck’s said more about the reviewer than the book being reviewed, and that bad reviews were a sign that his fiction was being taken seriously, yada yada, but he kept repeating, “I shouldn’t have done that, I’m sorry you had to see that.”

He was honestly distraught over what he’d done, and that he let his temper get the best of him, though he didn’t go back to Peck’s table and apologize. Peck and his friend (Yablonsky) stayed at their table for at least ten minutes while Stanley and I stayed at ours. . . .

Addendum: Interestingly, Crouch once took a steamboat trip up the Mississippi River with Richard Ford, who infamously spat on Colson Whitehead in retaliation for a negative review. They were sent on the jaunt to talk with each other about race.

Comments

Comments are closed.

On Twitter

  • 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' reissue includes missing chapter. http://bit.ly/9EPd8H http://bit.ly/a5jxHZ (via @galleycat) 40 mins ago
  • .@GrantaMag's sex issue is available in the iPhone store, for £1.19: http://bit.ly/aLJXHr 1 hr ago
  • McSweeney's seeks to award $2,500 to a female writer, age 32 or younger, of 'outrageous lyricism and heart': http://bit.ly/c2g4oS 2 hrs ago
  • .@BookCourt Have thought about writing to the shooter's grandkids, but it's a little awkward to know how to begin. 2 hrs ago
  • Er, I meant to say that a lot of amateur genealogists want to find out that THEY'RE (not their) related to Queen Elizabeth, or something. 2 hrs ago
  • .@BookCourt Also, one of my granddad's (supposedly thirteen, I've found six) wives shot him in the stomach. http://bit.ly/cr09l3 2 hrs ago
  • Recently I joined 23andme, which does genetics-based genealogy, and it's hilarious to see people trying to wriggle out of cold, hard science 2 hrs ago
  • Turns out a lot of people don't really want their trees tied to yours on ancestry.com when you put this kind of stuff on there. 2 hrs ago
  • And after getting out of jail, he came after my great-granddad in retaliation for his testimony at the trial. 2 hrs ago
  • Last month I found deeper background in old Texas criminal cases. Guy he killed had been convicted of attempting to rape his stepdaughter. 2 hrs ago
  • A couple years ago I verified the story about my great-granddad killing a man (in self-defense) with a hay hook. http://bit.ly/dpf5Yh 2 hrs ago
  • The genealogical information available online these days, if you're willing to hunt in multiple archives, is amazing. 2 hrs ago
  • 1,700 recorded oral histories from immigrants who came through Ellis Island available free online starting today: http://bit.ly/cTaBpX 3 hrs ago
  • More updates...

Subscribe

FTC Disclaimer

Search

Archives